The
following article is scheduled for publication in the November issue
of RePlay Magazine.
Size
Does Matter:
Selecting the Right Size For Your Center
By Randy White
© 2000 White Hutchinson Leisure & Learning
Group
There
once was a girl named Goldilocks who wanted to open an LBL (location-based
leisure facility) to make all the other boys and girls happy.
Goldie knew the value of research, so she decided to visit LBLs
owned by the Behr family. She visited the LBL operated by Papa
Behr, and it was HUGE! It was so huge that even though there were
many customers, they looked small and insignificant. It gave her
the creeps, so she left to visit the LBL operated by Baby Behr.
Boy, was it TINY! Even though it wasn't an especially busy day,
all the customers were jammed together like airline passengers
in coach. They looked about as happy, too. So Goldilocks skipped
out of there and poured herself a yummy hot chocolate. Then she
did some thinking. Goldilocks decided to review her feasibility
study to help her program the capacity of the center and all its
components to match market demand, thereby sizing the investment
based upon anticipated operating cash flows. And whaddaya know.
She got it just right.
Goldie
was no slouch. She knew that properly sizing your LBL has a profound
impact on profitability and long-term success. Unfortunately,
the sizing equations are normally left out of the planning of
many LBLs including FECs and LBEs, and miscalculations can be
deadly. Too large, and the place will look empty even when it's
busy, giving the impression of failure, plus your return on investment
will be low or negative. Too small, and not only will the facility
be crowded, a deterrent to repeat business, but you will invite
competition. To maximize profitability and assure long-term success,
you must get it just right.
Would You Buy Your Pants This
Way?
People
determine the size of an LBL using logic that would make no sense
in any other part of their lives. It's like shopping for pants
and blowing extra cash on a pair that's twice your size, or settling
for a pair that's way too small because that's all the store has
in stock.
Often,
investment criteria drive the decision of what size center to
develop. Prospective LBL owners decide that they only want to
invest a certain amount in a new center, say $2.0 million. The
typical total cash development cost to open an indoor center in
a renovated existing building is $120+ per square foot. This means
that $2.0 million buys a 16,000 SF center. Is this the size that
will be successful in this market? Who cares? It's what's in the
budget.
Then
again, sometimes owners use the availability of real estate to
determine the center's size. If there is a good vacant 25,000
SF store at a reasonable rent, then that's the size of the LBL.
Will a 25,000 SF center be profitable? Again, who cares? It's
what's in stock.
Many
owners get in serious trouble by using the level of investment,
the availability of real estate or some other factor to decide
what size center to develop. Rather than hope for the best, smart
cookies use a market-driven programming and investment approach
to size a center. The supportable investment and the center's
overall size, its program and the size of each component are determined
by the feasibility study and mathematical formulas.
There Is Such a Thing as Too Big.
And Too Small.
And
there is such a thing as "just right." The way you determine
what's "just right" is to base your LBL's size on the
market. The market-driven approach is based on the time-proven
concept of programming the capacity of the center and all its
components to match market demand (attendance), while sizing the
investment based upon anticipated operating cash flows. All calculations
are based upon the feasibility study.
If
the center is bigger or more lavish than the market can support,
you'll spend more money on the center than necessary and your
return on investment will, um, stink. But you don't want the center
or its components to be too small, either, for two reasons.
First,
if the center is too small for market demand, it will be crowded,
the lines will be too long for guests to be able to participate
in enough events, and they'll leave. Take the example of a client
who recently hired our company to evaluate his center's serious
sophomore slump. He opened his new FEC just 18 months earlier
and was experiencing a 40% slump in revenues in the 2nd
year. Our research determined that undersizing the needed capacity
for the go-kart track had resulted in long lines the first year,
permanently driving away customers.
Secondly,
underdevelopment invites new competition. You want to size the
center to meet market demand, not leave a big piece of the pie
for someone else to grab. Who knows? They may ultimately end up
with the whole pie.
A market feasibility study will establish the parameters needed
for both determining the physical size and the investment amount.
Based upon an examination of the surrounding area and direct and
indirect competition, a market area is established for the center.
Then, based upon analysis of the demographics and socio-economic/lifestyles
of residents and tourists, attendance and per capita expenditures
are projected. Annual revenues less projected operating expenses
then result in an annual cash flow that is used to calculate the
supportable investment based upon the financing structure and
required returns.
Celebrate Design Day
The
design principal of sizing is based upon using attendance to calculate
the concepts of design day and peak period attendance
or required operating capacity. It is neither economical
nor necessary to plan and size the operating capacity and physical
size to accommodate absolute peaks in attendance. However, to
meet market demands and not create a center that is too crowded,
the center should have an operating capacity adequate for busy
days. A good balance is achieved by planning for the design
day. Design day is not the busiest day, but is based upon
an average of the busiest days. Planning for the design day creates
a center large enough to accommodate the large number of guests
who come at peak times, while at the same time not expending excessive
capital to make the center unnecessarily huge.
Sizing the Box and the Stuff in
the Box
Now
that you know how many people are likely to visit on our nation's
newest holiday, Design Day (gifts optional), you can determine
how big the facility needs to be, as well as the mix of attractions
and the size of all the center's components. There are a number
of variables that affect overall size, including circulation space,
required seating, the overall mix and the capacity and throughput
of each event or center component.
It
is vital that your LBL have adequate entertainment capacity.
If 800 guests will be in the center at peak times, you sure don't
want 400 of them standing around with nothing to do. Nor do you
want them queued up forever. Theme parks can get away with long
lines because their length of stay is a day or more. If guests
can enjoy 1.5 rides per hour, that's fine. But in LBL-type centers
with lengths of stay of two or three hours, queues much over 5
minutes will permanently drive away guests.
Entertainment
capacity is calculated based upon the cumulative through-put
of all events. For example, a large soft-contained-play structure
might have a much larger capacity per square foot of floor area
than a roller coaster, but its through-put could be less since
children spend more time in the soft play than on a 2-minute roller
coaster ride.
Operating
and entertainment capacities not only has to be worked out
for overall attendance, but also by different age groups. If the
center is going to serve both younger children and adolescents,
the capacities need to be determined separately for each group,
as what works for one age group does not work for the others.
The
mix and size of events must be adjusted to provide both
the needed variety and the overall entertainment capacity. All
the capacity should not be in events with a high time spend rate,
or the per-capita spending per visit will be too high, decreasing
frequency of visits. There has to be adequate variety and balance
between anchor and impulse items. And there has to be balance
within the anchors. If one popular ride has an hourly through-put
of 400 guests while another popular one only has 200, then the
mix will be out of balance in terms of customer demand and capacity.
But Wait! There's More!
As
if that wasn't enough, there's also the matter of the token-operated
games, for which you must determine both the investment level
and the needed number of games. In LBLs, games are like popcorn
at the movies. Guests come to an LBL for the anchors just as they
go to the cinema for the movie, not the popcorn. The concession
stand should be large enough so that customers just wait in line
a minute or two.
Increasing
the size of the popcorn stand beyond that will not increase popcorn
sales, just like adding games above the supportable amount will
not increase game sales. If there are too many games, either your
return on investment in games will stink or the revenue from games
will be too low for your coin-operator to supply you with the
best new games. Too few games and there will be inadequate entertainment
capacity, guests will be frustrated and game revenues will be
lost.
The
correct number of games is a function of the projected annual
game revenue. A quality mix of new games requires a certain revenue
per week per game to support the investment. Annual revenue is
divided by 52 weeks, then by the revenue required per game to
arrive at the supportable number of games. This result is then
multiplied by the required floor area per game to arrive at the
approximate size of the game area.
Many Guests = One Really Large
Toilet
Just
kidding. But it's true that every center component needs to be
sized based upon required operating capacity. This includes the
number of fixtures in the restrooms and the size of the parking
lot. Don't count on zoning ordinances to tell you the number of
parking spaces or plumbing regulations to tell you how many fixtures
in your restrooms.
When
it comes to parking, zoning ordinances usually either don't have
an appropriate use category that matches LBL parking demands or
they underestimate what is required. And even if the LBL occupies
a former retail space, that doesn't mean the parking will be adequate.
LBL's peak parking demands far exceed those of retail.
Restrooms
are a special case. Rather than being sized based upon design
day attendance, they should be sized based on peak
attendance. That's because lines for the women's restroom will
turn off guests. And when preschoolers want to go, there better
not be any lines, or else. Again, building codes won't be a useful
guide. Plumbing regulations err both ways. Often, they assume
the center is a theatre, with everyone using the restrooms all
at once at intermission, greatly overestimating an LBL's needs.
And the number of fixtures needed for the ladies' room will be
greater than for the men's, no matter what the code says.
Operating
capacity must also be calculated for the number of check-ins,
the number of attendant stations at the redemption counter, the
number of café seats, the number and size of the party
rooms, even the size of the pizza ovens and grills. Storage capacities
also must be calculated based upon delivery frequencies or you
could run out of pizza dough or popular redemption prizes in the
middle of a busy Sunday afternoon.
Group
business adds another dimension to sizing of the entertainment
events. Children in birthday parties like to do things together.
If the average birthday party has 10 children and you only have
6 bumper cars, this won't work. And if 60 children arrive on a
school field trip, where will they assemble before being divided
into smaller groups? Where will they store their stuff? Is there
enough café seating for them plus regular guests?
What We Need Is a Plan
After
the program, capacity and sizing issues are all defined, they
must be translated into a master or preliminary plan. Naturally,
what works in theory doesn't translate exactly to the plan. Adjacencies
need to be worked out and certain events need to be zoned together.
Restrooms should be easy to find. Queues mustn't block the visibility
of events. Adequate circulation paths need to be designed. This
means that the required space will often exceed the earlier calculations.
The
preliminary plan tells you whether the development cost will match
the supportable investment. The preliminary plan is used to prepare
a realistic construction cost estimate and to project the costs
of all furniture, fixtures and equipment and all the soft costs.
Using a square-footage-construction-cost estimate has gotten many
an LBL in serious cost-overrun problems. Likewise, the preliminary
plan is used to cross check operating expenses, including labor.
Most likely the feasibility study only used some industry averages.
With a real plan, exact staffing requirements can be calculated.
Keep
in mind that there is a minimum size that will work, no matter
how small the market. LBLs can only shrink so much before the
formula fails. It takes a certain size center to accommodate a
mix that gives a center critical mass and drawing power. A six-player
laser tag arena just isn't exciting. Ten games do not make a game
room. There is no such thing as a four-hole miniature golf course.
Once soft-contained-play gets tiny, it has no perceived admission
value when the McDonalds PlayPlace is free.
There
are many markets where there is demand for out-of-home entertainment
but the market is not large enough to generate the needed investment
return on the cost of the minimum size center, which is why many
markets don't have an enclosed mall. Even in the smallest markets,
it still takes a minimum of around 20,000 SF for an indoor FEC
to make the formula work with sufficient variety and critical
mass, assuming sufficient market demand exists to support that
level of investment.
By
now, Goldilocks has graduated from hot chocolate to the harder
stuff. Hey, we never claimed it was easy to determine the "just
right" size of a center and its components. But it's a whole
lot easier than explaining to your banker and investors why guests
don't play at your place anymore.
Randy White is the CEO of the White
Hutchinson Leisure & Learning Group, a Kansas City, Missouri,
U.S. firm that specializes in market feasibility, consulting and
design of FECs and family and children's venues. The firm has won
many awards for the design of its domestic and international FECs.
Mr. White can be reach at voice: +816.931.1040, fax: +816.756.5058,
or via e-mail
or on the web at <www.whitehutchinson.com>.
|